In conflict-affected settings, saving lives is only the first step. Access to reconstructive surgery is essential to restore function, dignity, and social participation for survivors of severe injuries, blast wounds, and extensive burns. Modern warfare generates complex, long-term injuries as a result of explosions from air or drone strikes and shelling attacks. These patients overwhelm first-line healthcare systems, creating critical gaps in surgical resources and delaying essential interventions such as debridement, amputation, and tissue reconstruction.
Several examples illustrate the scale of reconstructive and rehabilitation needs in contemporary conflicts. Researchers from Duke University, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in London, and Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza found that as of May 2025, approximately 116,000 injuries were sustained in Gaza, with up to 46,000 requiring reconstructive surgery. In Ukraine, estimates suggest that over 50,000 war survivors require specialized reconstructive surgery. Broader rehabilitation data indicate that about 300,000 people have been registered with physical disabilities due to war-related injuries, highlighting both the immediate surgical burden and the long-term need for prosthetics, rehabilitation, and support for survivors to regain function and reintegrate into society.
Despite these immense needs, access to reconstructive surgical care remains extremely limited in many conflict-affected countries. The management of such patients requires a complex and coordinated continuum of care, from early identification and initial treatment to surgical intervention, prosthetic provision, rehabilitation, long-term follow-up, and sustainable financing.
A wide range of actors—including humanitarian organizations, healthcare professionals, local structures, and donors—are engaged across this continuum. However, these efforts are often fragmented, limiting their overall impact and leaving critical gaps in patient care.
Integrating reconstructive care into post-conflict and emergency health strategies is therefore crucial. This includes training first responders, establishing referral networks to specialized centers, and strengthening local surgical capacity.
This workshop aims to:
| 14.00 | Opening remarks
|
| 14.15 | Field Perspectives. Presentations
|
| 14.45 | Breakout Group Discussions
|
| 15.30 | Coffee break and networking |
| 16.00 | Group Reporting & Next Steps |
| 16.45 | Closing Remarks
|
Registration is free but mandatory
The discussion at the World Health Assembly (WHA) is important because it aims to position health promotion as a central pillar of public policies, shifting from a care-centred approach to a comprehensive well-being approach based on action on the determinants of health and the engagement of all sectors of society.
A paradigm shift: from care to well-being
The document highlights a global framework for well-being (adopted in 2024) that seeks to reorient health systems towards health promotion, not only the treatment of disease. This implies recognising that health is primarily shaped by living conditions (social, environmental, and economic determinants).
A global policy priority under construction
The WHA discussion is key as it aims to firmly embed health promotion within policy agendas, in alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals and the Geneva Charter for Well-being.
Today, health promotion is still often secondary in public decision-making, despite being essential for building resilient and equitable societies.
A call for multisectoral and systemic action
The proposed framework emphasises an approach that “engages the whole of government and the whole of society.”
This directly strengthens approaches such as Health in All Policies and Healthy Cities, calling for transformation across governance, economic systems, and public policies.
An operational challenge: scaling up implementation
Finally, this discussion is strategic as it seeks to translate concepts into concrete implementation, through policy guidance, indicators, and actionable mechanisms for Member States.
👉 See preparatory document EB158/27 https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB158/B158_27-en.pdf
Three approaches developed by the WHO provide practical frameworks for acting on the determinants of health. They share a common goal: integrating health across all public policies and living environments. By mobilising action at different levels — from cities to national governments — they aim to transform the conditions that shape health in everyday life. These approaches offer practical levers to shift from a care-oriented model towards a prevention- and equity-oriented approach.
Creating Healthy Cities
This approach places health at the centre of local policies. It encourages cities to act on living environments (urban planning, transport, housing, social cohesion) by engaging local authorities, stakeholders, and citizens, in order to sustainably improve health and well-being.
👉 https://www.who.int/activities/creating-healthy-cities/creating-healthy-cities
Health in All Policies and intersectoral action capacities
This approach focuses on systematically integrating health considerations into all public policies (such as economy, education, transport, agriculture, etc.). The aim is to improve policy coherence and to act upstream on the determinants of health.
👉 https://www.who.int/activities/Promoting-health-in-all-policies-and-intersectoral-action-capacities
WHO urban health strategies
This global framework addresses the specific challenges of urban settings (inequalities, pollution, access to services). It is aligned with the Geneva Charter for Well-being, which calls for building well-being societies by acting on the structural determinants of health, and with the WHO global framework for integrating well-being into public health (2023–2024), which provides strategic guidance for transforming systems. These urban strategies promote integrated, evidence-informed action and collaborative governance to make cities healthier, more inclusive, and more resilient.
👉 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116177
👉 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240084858
👉 https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/the-geneva-charter-for-well-being
15:30 – 17:30
This meeting is not open to the public.
It brings together stakeholders from Shanghai and Geneva who will explore opportunities for collaboration between Hospitals from Shanghai and Geneva University Hospitals.
12:30 – 14:30
This meeting is not open to the public.
It brings together stakeholders from Shanghai and Geneva who will explore opportunities for collaboration.
8:30 – 12:00
This meeting is not open to the public.
It brings together stakeholders from Shanghai and Geneva who will explore opportunities for collaboration.
The first session will explore the possibility of collaborating in the field of medical research.
The second session will explore opportunities for collaboration on tripartite projects involving China, Switzerland, and Africa. The role of digital tools in health programs and women’s health programs will be discussed in particular.
Established in 2006 by the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG) and the University of Geneva (UNIGE), the Geneva Health Forum (GHF) is a Swiss not-for-profit initiative that brings together a diverse range of stakeholders to discuss and address global health challenges.
The GHF plays a pivotal role in the global health landscape, as a neutral and inclusive platform, fostering dialogue and collaboration among key players in the field, including policymakers, representatives from academia, civil society, and the private sector.
Its core mission is to facilitate constructive dialogue among these global health actors, which, in turn, contributes to the improvement of health policies and access to care worldwide. The Geneva Health Forum proudly collaborates with some of the most prominent international organizations based in Geneva.